Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Keenan Reed-Kaliher challenges the respondent judge’s denial of his motion to modify the conditions of his probation and allow him to use medical marijuana consistent with the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819. For the reasons below, we accept special action jurisdiction and, because the respondent abused his discretion, we grant relief. See Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 3(c) (special action relief appropriate when decision constitutes abuse of discretion).
Factual and Procedural Background
¶…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017