Legal Opinion

Sotomayor v. Burns

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2000No. CV-00-0305-SAPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZLAKET, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This special action challenges the Arizona Legislative Council’s written analysis of Proposition 203, “English Language Education for Children in Public Schools,” for inclusion in the state’s voter information pamphlet. Petitioners claim that the Council violated the impartiality requirement of Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 19-124(B) (West Supp.1999) by misstating current bilingual education law; overstating parental rights to apply for waivers under the initiative; and exaggerating parental ability to obtain alternative programs. We considered the case without oral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fidanque v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mathieu v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Harris v. PurcellArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Arizona Legislative Council v. HoweArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Citizens for Growth Management v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. League of Ariz. Cities and Towns v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Weinstein v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Highland Village Partners, LLC v. BRADBURY & STAMM CONSTRUCTION CO.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Citizens for Growth Management v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API