Legal Opinion

Quality Education & Jobs Supporting I-16-2012 v. Bennett

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2013No. CV-12-0286-AP/ELPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Justice.

¶ 1 Quality Education & Jobs Supporting I-16-2012 (“the Committee”) challenged the Secretary of State’s descriptive title and “yes/no” language used for that initiative (“Proposition 204” or “the Act”) in the Secretary’s voter information guide and ballot for the November 2012 general election. The superior court rejected that challenge, finding the language was “not arbitrary or unquestionably inaccurate” and therefore substantially complied with A.R.S. § 19-125(D) (2012). On August 28, 2012, we issued an order treating the Committee’s appeal from that ruling as an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Arizona Legislative Council v. HoweArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Citizens for Growth Management v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rep Andrew Tobin v. Hon ReaArizona Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jaime a Molera v. Katie HobbsArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Lane v. ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  3. Protect Our Arizona v. hobbs/healthcare RisingArizona Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API