Legal Opinion
Independent Taxicab Operators' Ass'n v. Yellow Cab Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 15, 1968No. 39613PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WEIGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are twenty-four San Francisco taxicab owners and operators. Their amended antitrust complaint 1 al leges that the defendants had engaged knowingly and continuously in a combination and conspiracy to monopolize the general and interstate taxicab business in the City and County of San Francisco in restraint of interstate trade and commerce in violation of the Sherman Act, §§ 1, 2, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (1964). They seek treble damages and injunctive relief pursuant to section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., Doing Business as Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Reid Brothers Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Burkhead v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Cow Palace, Ltd. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.