Legal Opinion
Reid Brothers Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1983No. Nos. 81-3444, 81-3448PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
The defendants-appellants, Ketchikan Pulp Company (“KPC”) and Alaska Lumber and Pulp Company (“ALP”) come before this Court alleging errors by the district court in finding a conspiracy between the defendants in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2. The appellants also challenge the district court’s award of damages to the plaintiff-appellee, Reid Brothers Logging Company (“RBLC”). After a careful review of the extensive record, we find that the district court’s holdings are substantially supported by the evidence.
I. THE CONSPIRACY
A. Background
T…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stanley F. Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Blanton v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Calculators Hawaii, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Brandt, Inc. And Reynold M. Hallett, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Granite Partners, L.P. v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Triangle Mining Co., Inc., and Terteling Land Company v. Stauffer Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.