Legal Opinion
Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 25, 1962No. 304PublishedCited by 927 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
This is a private treble damage action under the antitrust laws. Continental Ore Company, a partnership, and its individual partners, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, are petitioners here. Henry J. Leir, the principal party in Continental, had engaged in the buying and selling of metals, including vanadium products, in Europe prior to 1938, in which year he immigrated to the United States. This case concerns his subsequent efforts in this country to build a successful business in the production and sale of vanadium.
Vanadium is a metal obtained from certain ores which, in this country,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by927 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
922 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.