Legal Opinion
Burkhead v. Phillips Petroleum Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 5, 1970No. 51531PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
GERALD S. LEVIN, District Judge.
This is an antitrust case brought under provisions of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15, 26) and the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 15). Plaintiff is an individual, and has been the lessee and operator of a service station since approximately 1959. Until July 14, 1966, said service station was controlled by Tidewater Oil Company . [“Tidewater”]. Thereafter, as a result of defendant Phillips Petroleum Company’s [“Phillips”] acquisition of certain of Tidewater’s assets in 1966, plaintiff’s service station has been controlled and leased by Phillips.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Kenneth Lehrman v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Cia. Petrolera Caribe, Inc. v. Arco Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Nbo Industries Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation, in Nos. 74-2127, 75-1152 Appeal of Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., in No. 74-2128Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Optivision, Inc. v. Syracuse Shopping Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.