Legal Opinion
Rohm & Haas Co. v. Permutit Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 16, 1953No. Civ. 1525PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is an infringement suit and the questions arise from a motion to dismiss the complaint. Affidavits having been filed and not excluded, the questions are considered as on a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.
The complaint alleges the issuance of a patent to the plaintiff on February 24, 1953, covering, generally, matters relating to insoluble resins used in the treatment of water, and a notice of infringement is alleged in an affidavit to have been dated the same day. On the same day, February 24, 1953, this present action was brought.
With the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Gibson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Porter v. SenderowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hull v. Brandywine Fibre Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Proler Steel Corp. v. Luria Brothers & Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
- General Steel Products Company v. LorenzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.