Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ROBSON, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that it has been judicially determined that the precise product here involved did not infringe, and since the only possible infringing change in the product occurred years subsequent to the filing of the instant suit that change could not serve to cure the fatal defect of the complaint of want, of infringement prior to suit.
This suit was filed August 4, 1954, on patent No. 2,559,990, issued July 10, 1951, and Reissue No. 23,843, dated June 29, 1954, to one Oace, for an…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Superior Insulating Tape Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Proler Steel Corp. v. Luria Brothers & Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
- Plymouth Rubber Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
- General Steel Products Company v. LorenzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.