Proler Steel Corp. v. Luria Brothers & Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
This action is now before the court, after oral hearing, on a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff, Proler Steel Corporation, filed a suit for declaratory judgment, alleging that defendant, Luria Brothers & Company, Inc., has begun the construction of a plant in California which is designed to practice a process, and with the intent to practice a process, which will infringe plaintiff’s Reissue Patent No. Re. 25,034. The particularities of the patented process are only relevant to-the disposition of the pending motion to* a limited extent and will not be set out herein. Upon…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Evers v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lang v. Pacific Marine and Supply Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Lang v. Pacific Marine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Erbamont Inc. v. Cetus Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Swedlow, Inc., a Corporation v. Rohm & Haas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Proler Steel Corporation v. Luria Brothers & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.