Legal Opinion

Porter v. Senderowitz

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 19, 1946No. 9156, 9193PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration pursuant to Section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942. For the purpose of discussion here we may divide the relief asked for into three parts.

First. This is concerned with the 'application for equitable relief. This relief was granted by the court.

Second. There was asked for and granted a judgment for treble damages in the amount of $1,257.15 for sales at over-ceiling prices of certain styles of articles which the defendants manufactured. Judgment for the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bonner v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. La Salle National Bank, Not Personally but as Trustee, Under Trust No. 17365 and Aaron B. Weiner v. 222 East Chestnut Street CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. United States v. DavioDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
  4. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  5. Porter v. Eastern Sugar AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API