Legal Opinion

Gayler v. Wilder

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1851PublishedCited by 336 opinions

" This was a writ of error to the, Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The defendant in error (who was plaintiff in the court below) brought an action against Gayler and Brown (the plaintiffs, in error), for an alleged infringement of a patent right for the.use of plaster of -Paris in the construction of fire-proof chests. . In the declaration, it was averred that one Daniel Fitzgerald Was the original and first inventor of a new and-…

Read the full summary

" This was a writ of error to the, Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The defendant in error (who was plaintiff in the court below) brought an action against Gayler and Brown (the plaintiffs, in error), for an alleged infringement of a patent right for the.use of plaster of -Paris in the construction of fire-proof chests. . In the declaration, it was averred that one Daniel Fitzgerald Was the original and first inventor of a new and- useful improvemeht in fire-proof chests or safes, and that letters patent were granted him therefor, bearing date the 1st…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taney

Three objections have been taken to the instructions given by the Circuit Court at the trial, and neither' of them is, perhaps, entirely free from difficulty.

The first question arises upon the assignment of Fitzgerald to Enos Wilder. The assignment was made and recorded in the Patent-Office before the patent issued. It afterwards issued to Fitzgerald. And the plaintiffs in error insist that this *493assignment did not convey to Wilder the legal right to the monopoly subsequently conferred by the patent, and that the plaintiff, who claims under him, cannot therefore maintain this action.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herbert v. AdamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1825

3Cited by336 opinions

  1. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

331 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API