Legal Opinion

Hull v. Brandywine Fibre Products Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 25, 1954No. Civ. A. 1514PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

This is a motion for a summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.

At a former stage of the case, viz., on December 1, 1953, an opinion was filed as to the status then considered. Reargument as to certain matters has been had, and the former opinion is annulled and this opinion substituted therefor.

The original complaint filed December 30, 1952 was quite abbreviated in form. It alleged diversity of citizenship and set out two causes of action. The first cause of action simply alleged an indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff in the sum of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ford v. Luria Steel & Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Gibson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Nesbit v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Mortgage InvestorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Flying W Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Susan R. Lindsey v. M.A. Zeccola & Sons, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation M.A. ZeccolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Easter v. Kass-Berger, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Chidester v. Eastern Gas & Fuel AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API