Legal Opinion

Eadus v. Hunter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1930No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 34,412PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

August 13, 1928, plaintiffs executed a 10-year oil and gas lease on property held by the entire- ties. It ran to defendant Hunter, but was negotiated by Moyer for tbe benefit of all the defendants. After Mrs. Eadus signed, Eadús and Moyer deposited the lease in a bank in escrow, under an instrument drafted by Moyer but signed by Eadus alone, conditioning delivery of the lease to defendants on their commencing actual drilling within 60 days after a near-by well should produce. The adjoining well produced on September 14th. The condition for delivery was not performed, but about October 23d the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bailey v. GroverMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Zeigen v. RoiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Schram v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  3. Jaenicke v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Eadus v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Antrim County Treasurer v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API