Legal Opinion

Way v. Root

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1913No. Docket No. 106PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Error to Yan Burén; Des Yoignes, J. Assumpsit by Harrison S. Way against Herbert L. Boot for breach of a contract to convey land to plaintiff’s assignor. . Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

This action is brought to recover damages for breach of a land contract given by defendant on February 20, 1908, agreeing to sell and convey to George Way, son of plaintiff, for the sum of $300, a tract of land, containing three and a fraction acres, situate in S. W. i of section 34, in Pine Grove township, Van Burén county. The contract was in writing, and signed by both said Root and Way. By its terms a payment of one-half was to be made at once and $50 per year for three successive years, with interest, at 6 per cent, per annum, defendant to give a deed of the premises when Way had fully…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Pray v. StebbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Hammond v. HanninMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Naylor v. MinockMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Morrill v. MorrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. AntarDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  3. Morgan v. Cincinnati InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Budwit v. HerrMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API