Legal Opinion

Jaenicke v. Davidson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1939No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 40,428PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a suit in chancery for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement between plaintiff and Isaiah. Davidson (hereinafter called defendant) by the terms of which plaintiff was to receive a 1/32 overriding royalty interest in certain oil leases held by defendant, such interest being claimed by plaintiff as consideration for her services as a broker in disposing of these leases for defendant. Defendant denies plaintiff’s right to specific performance on the ground, among others, that she was acting as a real estate broker within the meaning’ of Act No. 306, Pub. Acts 1919, as amended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Leland v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Attorney General v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Eadus v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Energetics, Ltd v. WhitmillMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Krause v. BoraksMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Summers v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. FORTNEY OIL CO., ETC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API