Zeigen v. Roiser
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Oakland; Smith, J. Bill by Frederick H. Zeigen against Charles H. Roiser and wife, Florence S. Fox, and others, for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case presents mainly questions of fact, which are much in dispute.
1. By his bill of complaint, plaintiff claims that in March, 1914, he was the owner of the interest of the vendee in a certain land contract made in 1906, by Henry F. Barnard of the first part, wherein and whereby said Barnard agreed to sell and convey to one Susan Gibbs, as party of the second part, certain *329described lots known as Nos. 74-76 Prentis avenue, in the city, of Detroit — said land contract being duly assigned to the plaintiff.
2’. That in January, 1912, John Rich and wife, as parties of the first part, had made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Aplin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Martin v. State Compensation CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Eadus v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Stevens v. WakemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Sasso v. Meacham Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.