Legal Opinion

Langford v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1994No. LUBA 93-090; CA A81712PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

The City of Eugene (city) and Lane County Housing Authority and Community Services Agency (HACSA) seek review of LUBA’s decision remanding the city’s approval of HACSA’s application for a conditional use permit to construct a “controlled income and rent” (CIR) low income housing project. LUBA concluded that the city erred in three respects: its findings relating to the adequacy of the emergency response system that would serve the project were conclusory and insufficient; its findings that school facilities would be adequate to meet anticipated demand were not supported by substantial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Reusser v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huntzicker v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Zippel v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. deBardelaben v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Schwerdt v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API