Legal Opinion
Huntzicker v. Washington County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 29, 1996No. LUBA 94-160, 94-181; CA A92180PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LUBAs affirmance of the Washington County governing body’s approval of respondent Central Bethany Development Company’s (respondent) application for a planned development. We affirm.
We take the facts, in part, from LUBA’s opinion:
“On or about December 31, 1992, [respondent] filed an application for approval of the ‘Bethany Planned Development Master Plan’ (master plan) on 92 acres. The subject property is in the area governed by the Bethany Community Plan (BCP), which encompasses three square miles of the unincorporated portion of northeast Washington County. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Zippel v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Langford v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alliance for Responsible Land Use v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Neighbors for Livability v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Carlsen v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Department of Transportation v. City of MosierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Holland v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.