Legal Opinion

Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 1992No. LUBA 92-087; CA A76884PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner purchased property in the Goose Hollow area of Portland on which he plans to operate a car wash facility. In the course of his discussions with city planning personnel, they perceived a possible conflict among potentially applicable provisions of the city code and instituted a “clarification” proceeding to resolve it. The hearings officer interpreted the provisions in a manner that was compatible with allowing the facility. Respondent Goose Hollow Foothills League (League) sought review by the city council, which affirmed the hearings officer’s decision. Respondents appealed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Thunderbird Motel, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reusser v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Church v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Derry v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Alliance for Responsible Land Use v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API