Legal Opinion
deBardelaben v. Tillamook County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 31, 1996No. LUBA 95-238; CA A93091PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner Carter (petitioner) seeks review of LUBA’s reversal of Tillamook County’s allowance of a variance from a height restriction in conjunction with petitioner’s construction of an addition to his house. LUBA concluded that the county governing body’s interpretation of the variance provisions of its land use ordinance (sometimes “LUO” in the quoted material) was reversible under ORS 197.829 and Clark v. Jackson County, 313 Or 508, 836 P2d 710 (1992). We reverse.
Petitioner’s residence is located near the beach, and it currently has 1,600 square feet of living space. Petitioner proposes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Zippel v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Langford v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marquam Farms Corp. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Kelley v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Schwerdt v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Spencer Creek Neighbors v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998