Legal Opinion

Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1993No. 93-002; CA A80307PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioners seek Supreme Court review and, thereby, our reconsideration of our opinion. They argue that, in holding that Jefferson County’s interpretation of its zoning ordinance was not reversible under the standard of review articulated in Clark v. Jackson County, 313 Or 508, 836 P2d 710 (1992), we accorded more deference to the local government’s interpretation of its land use legislation than Clark requires or even allows. We allow reconsideration to respond to petitioners’ contentions regarding that question.

Petitioners assert that Clark requires consideration, inter alia, of the context…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Byrd v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Cope v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding TeamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API