Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Goldman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 26, 2007PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 14, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as an office manager at a hospital. After a coworker reported that claimant had smoked in the office they shared, thereby violating the employer’s policy prohibiting smoking on the premises, the employer conducted an investigation. Based upon the evidence adduced, the employer planned to terminate claimant’s employment. Claimant resigned from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of WiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of OddoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of NorvellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of Dzugas-SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of NovakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of KridelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.