In re the Claim of Kridel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 10, 2007, which, among other things, *466ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
From August 2005 through November 2006, claimant worked as a paralegal at a law firm on an hourly basis. In October 2006, the law firm adopted a policy prohibiting hourly employees from taking breaks during the workday, except for a midday lunch break. Claimant violated this policy by taking breaks to smoke cigarettes, as she had done…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of StraderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Cunningham (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020