Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kridel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 7, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 10, 2007, which, among other things, *466ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

From August 2005 through November 2006, claimant worked as a paralegal at a law firm on an hourly basis. In October 2006, the law firm adopted a policy prohibiting hourly employees from taking breaks during the workday, except for a midday lunch break. Claimant violated this policy by taking breaks to smoke cigarettes, as she had done…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of StraderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re the Claim of PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Matter of Cunningham (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API