Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Dzugas-Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 12, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 6, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was discharged from his employment due to disqualifying misconduct. “A claimant’s failure to comply with an employer’s policies or acting in a manner that is potentially detrimental to the employer’s best interest may constitute disqualifying…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of RuggieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of MeagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of ManiesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of ManiesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- MatterofManieson[Commr.ofLabor]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014