Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Novak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 26, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 21, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant, a social worker, was discharged from her employment due to disqualifying misconduct—namely, falsifying her time sheet. Claimant’s time sheet for April 9, 2007 indicates that claimant was performing indirect patient services between 3:35 p.m. and 4:35 p.m. During…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of MarioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of MustafaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Stern (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015