Legal Opinion

Rickman v. Houck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — OSCAR Hale, Judge. Suit for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. Decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.

' tobmawob: men-tai incapacity. On the 4th day of August, 1919, Mrs. Susan Armpriest entered into a written contract with appellees, to sell and convey certain property located in the city of Burlington, Iowa, for the agreed price of $2,200, $500 in cash, and the balance, of $1,700, on or before September 1, 1919. On the 2d day of September, 1919, a deed was drawn up in accordance with the contract of sale of the premises, and signed by Susan Armpriest. This deed was not delivered, but was found by appellant, guardian, among the papers of her ward, and produced on the trial, and offered in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Swartwood v. ChanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Mathews v. NashSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Evers v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Utterback v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Wilson v. FindleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Dunlop v. WeverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Kunde v. O'BrianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Orr v. GraybillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API