Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mutch

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 24, 1917PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Tama District Qotvrt. — J. W. Willett, Judge. Suit for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. Decree for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

3" bokmanceTEcoilawe?weakness equate ¿onsid I. James and Mary Mutch, husband and wife, on April 28, 1913, made a written contract with E. M. Mitchell, in consideration of $57,600, to be paid, $600 in cash, $5,000 March 1, 1914, the balance in 10 years at 5 per cent interest, to sell and convey to him the south half of Section 3, Township 86, Range 15, Tama County, Iowa. The contract, as originally written, did not require the purchaser to secure the payment of the $52,000, but, on June 11th following, a stipulation was written on the contract, signed by the purchaser, and by the grantors by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. New York Brokerage Co. v. WhartonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Nowlen v. NowlenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Reese v. ShutteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Swartwood v. ChanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Utterback v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Crawford v. RaibleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Mitchell v. MutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Cohen Bros. Iron & Metal Co. v. Shackelford Brick Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Durband v. NeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API