Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Nash

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1911PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Pottaivattamie District Court. — Hon. E. B. Woodruee, Judge. Suit in equity to set aside a land contract. 'Judgment for tbe plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, C. J.

In July, 1907, Viola S. Mathews, the plaintiff’s ward, entered into a written contract with the defendant, ■ Bert E. Nash, by the terms of which she agreed to purchase of Nash three hundred and twenty acres of land situated in Dallam county, Texas, and to pay therefor the sum of $4,800. She paid $700 in cash when she executed the contract and gave her notes for the remainder of the agreed purchase price. Mrs. Mathews afterwards paid several of the notes she had thus given. In January, 1909, the district court found that Mrs. Mathews was of unsound mind and appointed the plaintiff, who is her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reese v. ShutteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Swartwood v. ChanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Seerley v. SaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. City of Keokuk v. Fort Wayne Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Olsson v. PiersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Sjulin v. Clifton Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Hult v. Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Dunlop v. WeverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API