Legal Opinion

Utterback v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1929No. 39635PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Plaintiffs found their suit upon alleged mental incapacity of and undue influence and fraud practiced on deT cedent, Henry Fritzler.

I. Decedent, Henry Fritzler, acquired the farm in controversy about the time of the Civil War, was married in 1868, the next spring moved on the land, and lived there until his death. No child was born to him. The wife. appears to have largely looked after theii~ business affairs until her death, in 1922. The ~`ife `5 death ~as a great shock to decedent. Shortly after that event, he leased the farm to defendants; who thereupon moved upon it, and took up their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Curtis v. ArmagastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Sutherland State Bank v. FurgasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Pruitt v. GauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Mitchell v. MutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Albaugh v. ShropeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Merritt v. EasterlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. In Re Lundvall's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. First National Bank in Sioux City v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Groves v. GrovesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Donaldson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API