Legal Opinion

Saltzsieder v. . Saltzsieder

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1916PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment, entered June 1, 1915, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directing a judgment in favor of defendants, respondents. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The deed is absolutely void.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment, entered June 1, 1915, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directing a judgment in favor of defendants, respondents. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The deed is absolutely void. Its delivery was a pretense; its existence being kept concealed until Saltzsieder’s death. Timm always held it as his agent. (Roosevelt v. Carow, 6 Barb. 190; Churchill v.…

1Opinion of the CourtCollin, J.

The plaintiff seeks and was awarded by the Special Term a judgment establishing the invalidity and cancellation of an instrument purporting to be a conveyance of real estate by Frederick W. Saltzsieder to his sons, Frederick W., Walter H. and Herbert Gr. Saltzsieder. The Appellate Division by an unanimous decision reversed the judgment and held that the instrument was valid and effective.

While the Special Term and Appellate Division are in disagreement as to certain findings of fact, they are not as to these: On May 21, 1898, Frederick W. Saltzsieder, the father, was engaged to be married to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Munoz v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Donahue v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Acme Realty Co. v. . SchinasiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Manhattan Life Insurance v. Continental Insurance CompaniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Herrmann v. JorgensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Schultz v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API