Legal Opinion

Arias v. Springer

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1938No. Nos. 4333, 4334PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

The two cases were consolidated for the purpose of taking testimony, as the greater part of the evidence is pertinent to both cases.

A decree was entered by the district court in each case, canceling a deed because the grantor’s signature thereon (ostensibly that of Mary de Romero) was a forgery.

The principal question is one of procedure brought about by an application of the defendants (appellees here), filed in due time, to set aside this decree.

After the parties had concluded the introduction of testimony at the original hearing; the district court decided that the alleged…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Henderson v. DreyfusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Telman v. GallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Saltzsieder v. . SaltzsiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Davidson v. EnfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sundt v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Latta v. HarveyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API