Arias v. Springer
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
The two cases were consolidated for the purpose of taking testimony, as the greater part of the evidence is pertinent to both cases.
A decree was entered by the district court in each case, canceling a deed because the grantor’s signature thereon (ostensibly that of Mary de Romero) was a forgery.
The principal question is one of procedure brought about by an application of the defendants (appellees here), filed in due time, to set aside this decree.
After the parties had concluded the introduction of testimony at the original hearing; the district court decided that the alleged…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Henderson v. DreyfusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Telman v. GallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Saltzsieder v. . SaltzsiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Davidson v. EnfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Sundt v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Latta v. HarveyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.