Legal Opinion

Herrmann v. Jorgenson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1934PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The judgment appealed from, entered in this case on the 28th day of November, 1932, declared a deed dated May 26, 1916, made by the late Frederick F. Brueck to the defendants Kathryne Brueck and Chrystine H. Brueck, now Kathryne Jorgenson and Chrystine H, Bender, invalid and insufficient to transfer to them the property described therein. The facts are not disputed and can as well be taken from the briefs of counsel as from the findings of the court. On this appeal from the unanimous affirmance by the Appellate Division we must determine whether these facts sustain the conclusion embodied in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Albany County Savings Bank v. McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Ten Eyck v. . WhitbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Eisenlord v. . ClumNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Abercrombie v. Andrew CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. In re HalpernNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Courtland v. Walston & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. Goodell v. RosettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API