Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Young

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1933No. 3830PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

This is an action in ejectment brought by appellee, administrator of the estate of William H. Taylor, deceased, for a tract of land in Roswell of which he claims that Taylor died seised. Appellants deny appellee’s claim and, alleging that Mrs. Young is the owner of the premises, in question, scqk, by cross-complaint, to have title quieted in her. Prom a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee, appellants prosecute this appeal.

The first point relied upon by appellants for reversal is that the trial court erred in overruling defendants’ motion for a change of venue, and in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Donahue v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Saltzsieder v. . SaltzsiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Cunningham v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Deats v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. AlanizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Chandler v. BattenfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API