Legal Opinion

United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Gerald A. Henderson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2001No. 00-10168PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Gerald Henderson appeals his conviction under 43 U.S.C. § 1733(a) for violations of two subsections of 43 C.F.R. § 3715.6, a regulation promulgated by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Defendant contends that the magistrate judge 1 committed reversible error when he failed to instruct the jury that 43 U.S.C. § 1733 is a “specific intent” offense, requiring the prosecution to prove that Defendant knew that his conduct was unlawful. We agree with Defendant that 43 U.S.C. § 1733 is a specific-intent offense. However, because the magistrate judge’s failure to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-UlibarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Gary HancockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Jose Alfredo Reyes-Platero, defendant-appellant.bCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. AwadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Gary ErmoianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Marvin L. Wiseman, United States of America v. William D. MettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. MousaviCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. JensenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API