Legal Opinion
United States v. Marvin L. Wiseman, United States of America v. William D. Mett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 19, 2001No. 00-10325, 00-10341PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Marvin L. Wiseman and William D. Mett (“Defendants”) were convicted in 1997 of embezzling money from a pension benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This court reversed their convictions on appeal and remanded for a new trial. United States v. Mett, 178 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir.1999). After the district court rejected Defendants’ proposed jury instructions, Defendants waived a trial by jury and agreed to a bench trial on the transcripts and exhibits of the first trial. Defendants were again convicted on all counts. They now…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Pantelis Antonakeas, AKA Alexx AntaeusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- United States v. CastaganaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Perdomo-EspanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.