Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-Ulibarry

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2000No. 98-50610PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge FISHER; Concurrence by Judge FERNANDEZ.

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, a previously deported alien who “enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in” the United States without the express consent of the Attorney General is subject to a fine and imprisonment for up to two years.1 In Pena-Cabanillas v. United States, 394 F.2d 785, 788-90 (9th Cir.1968), we held that illegal reentry into the United States under § 1326 required only a showing of general intent because it was a malum prohibitum regulatory offense and the statute did not otherwise specify an…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. United States v. Resendiz-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Miguel Trinidad-AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API