United States v. Jensen
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Defendant Stephanie Jensen moves this Court for a new trial, arguing that there are five justifications for overturning the jury’s guilty verdict: (1) the Court’s jury instruction for “willful” was erroneous; (2) the Books & Records statute is void for vagueness; (3) Congress precluded conspiracy liability for a Books & Records charge; (4) the Court failed to instruct the jury that, to be convicted, Jensen had to know the backdated documents affected Brocade’s financial statements; and (5) there is a reasonable probability…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009