Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Alfredo Reyes-Platero, defendant-appellant.b
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2000No. 99-50234PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion, filed July 11, 2000, is amended as follows.
At slip op. 7839, insert the following before the paragraph that starts “DISMISSED ...”:
In a petition for rehearing, Reyes-Platero argues that our opinion conflicts with United States v. Leone, 215 F.3d 253 (2d Cir.2000), which was decided after we took his case under submission. In Leone, the Second Circuit followed its occasional practice of remanding a defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim to the district court from a direct appeal for further fact-finding. Id. at 257. The court stated that it chose to remand,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Hector Francisco MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sareang Ye v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and United States Attorney General Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Willard Cortez RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Pascual Dionicio JeronimoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jacobo CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Theodore John KaczynskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.