Legal Opinion
United States v. Mousavi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 2010No. 08-50454PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IKUTA, Circuit Judge.
Seyed Mahmood Mousavi appeals from his federal criminal convictions for, among other things, willfully providing services to Iran in violation of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), 50 U.S.C. § 1705, and the Iranian Transaction Regulations (ITR), 31 C.F.R. § 560.206, commonly referred to as the United States’ trade embargo against Iran. Mousavi argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to allow any rational juror to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of willfully violating the ITR. We conclude, viewing the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Roosevelt Anderson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Ethan BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MeredithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- United States v. Ethan BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.