Berry v. Pond
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
In 1889, Steinle bought a one-sixteenth section of land from the United States. Assuming that he owned a full forty acres running 1320' x 1320', he made a “paper” plat of “E. Steinle’s 40 Acre Tract,” dividing it into eight five-acre lots. The southwest lot was designated lot 8. The plat was filed and since 1889 has served as reference for legal descriptions in conveyances and in tax assessments. The correct north boundary of the tract was known, and Steinle built a south boundary fence 1320 feet south of it.
The original government survey was erroneous in that, while the east-west dimension…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Buty v. GoldfinchWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Pinkham v. PinkhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Nalley v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Rushton v. BordenWashington Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Label v. CleasbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Carlson v. StairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Smith v. HenleyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Palin v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Mayer v. HerrinWashington Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.