Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Herrin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1952No. 31876Published

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an action commenced in 1950 for specific performance of an oral contract to dedicate land for a private park and bathing beach.

• The plaintiff bought “Lot 4, of Tembreulls’ Lake Lucerene Div. No. 1, located in the NW % of Sec. 28, Twn. 22, N. R. 6 E. W. M.,” in King county, Washington, from the partnership of G. A. and R. D. Tembreull, in December, 1944. During the negotiations for the purchase, the partnership orally promised that all of the property immediately in front of, and between “Tembreulls’ Lake Lucerene Div. No. 1” and' Lake Lucerne, which was then being cleared and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buty v. GoldfinchWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Pinkham v. PinkhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Berry v. PondWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API