Legal Opinion

Palin v. Sherman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1951No. 31652PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

We are here concerned with the right to the possession of a six-foot strip of land, the claimant in possession having title by adverse possession and the claimant seeking possession having a tax title. There is no statement of facts, and we are therefore concerned only with whether the court drew the proper conclusion of law from the facts as found, and entered a judgment consistent therewith.

Appellants had legal title to lot 8, block 5, Junett’s addition to Tacoma, W. T. Their predecessors in interest had, prior to 1930, moved the dwelling house situated on lot 8 so that it extended over the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hanson v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Berry v. PondWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Johnson v. BurgesonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rushton v. BordenWashington Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Label v. CleasbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API