Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 4, 1918No. 9275PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John I. Mullins, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

The defendant in error filed with the Industrial Commission a claim for compensation under Chapter 179, Laws of 1915, for injury to one of his eyes while in the employ of plaintiff in error The Spraltlen-Andersom Mercantile Company.

On a hearing on the complaint the Commission found that Johnson had become totally blind in one eye by reason of said injury, and awarded him seven dollars per week for 104 weeks. Later, a rehearing was granted; the Commission found that Johnson still had useful vision, and reduced the period during which compensation was to be paid to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Hills v. Oval Wood Dish Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. Day v. Sioux Falls Fruit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Karoly v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API