Legal Opinion

Karoly v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1918No. 9281PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to the Denver District Cowrt, Eon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen.

On and prior to August 6, 1915, the plaintiff in error, Joe Karoly, was an employee of The Colorado Fuel and Iron Company, one of the defendants in error. On the date above named Joe Karoly was injured by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The employee and employer, above named, were each subject to the com*240pensation provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Chapter 179, Session Laws 1915). They were unable to come to an agreement in regard to compensation, and the employee applied for a hearing before the Industrial Commission. Such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  2. Roberts v. Charles Wolff Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Matecny v. Vielding Steel WorksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  4. Western Lumber & Pole Co. v. City of GoldenColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Martin v. Montezuma-Cortez School District Re-1Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Central Surety & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Dodge v. Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Buckley v. ChilcuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Sullivan v. Anselmo Mining Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API