Legal Opinion

Day v. Sioux Falls Fruit Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1920No. File No. 4678PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. Hon. Louis L. FeeEger, Judge'. Action by Frank Day and Pearl Day, against the Sioux Falls Fruit Company, a corporation, and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, to recover compensation under Workmen’s Compensation Law for death of plaintiff’s son, employee of the first named defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. Hon. Louis L. FeeEger, Judge'. Action by Frank Day and Pearl Day, against the Sioux Falls Fruit Company, a corporation, and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, to recover compensation under Workmen’s Compensation Law for death of plaintiff’s son, employee of the first named defendant. From a judgment in circuit court affirming the award of the Industrial 'Commissioner, which latter affirmed award of arbitrators, defendants appeal. (3) To point three of the opinion, Respondent cited: Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co., 89 Conn. 357, 94 A.…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, P. J.

This action arises under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (chapter 277, Laws of 1917), and was instituted 'by Frank L. Day and Pearl Day, father and mother of one Van P. Day’, a son, who was killed while in the employunent of the Sioux Falls Fruit Company, at the city of Sioux Falls, on the 12th day of March,- 1919. Claim, was filed with the industrial commissioner by said parents claiming that they were dependent for support upon said deceased employe at the time of his death. The said employer and its insurer, the codefendant, resisted said claim. Under the’provisions of said law a board of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Parson v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bloomington-Bedford Stone Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Industrial Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Edge v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Milwaukee Basket Co. v. WieckiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Vodopich v. Trojan Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API