Legal Opinion

Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 5, 1962No. 20141PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

By reason of circumstances called to its attention, the Industrial Commission, on its own motion, reopened the claim of Joe Tamburelli for workmen’s compensation against his employer, the Colorado Fuel and Iron Corporation. After a hearing, the commission found and determined that claimant’s condition had worsened since the entry of a prior award, and that he was presently permanently and totally disabled. The supplemental award, based upon such finding and determination, was attacked in the district court where, after hearing, it was affirmed. The judgment of affirmance is the subject of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byouk v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  2. Passini v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Industrial Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Wierman v. TunnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. United Airlines, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Askew v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Padilla v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. American Metals Climax, Inc. v. CisnerosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API