Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Baca
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 30, 1984No. 83SC90PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Baca, 670 P.2d 1244 (Colo.Ct.App.1983), dismissing an appeal brought by Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears) against the Industrial Commission of Colorado (Industrial Commission or Commission) and the Colorado Division of Labor (Division). The Commission denied as untimely Sears’ request for participation by the subsequent injury fund (SIF or fund) in a workmen’s compensation proceeding. Sears sought review of the Commission’s order, claiming that the Commission’s failure to promulgate…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Elizondo v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Moland v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.