Legal Opinion

Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2009No. 2007-1222 and 2007-1370PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

I

{¶ 1} The Fourth District Court of Appeals certified this case pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution and App.R. 25. The court of appeals found its judgment to be in conflict with the judgments of the First and Tenth District Courts of Appeals1 on the following issue: “[wjhether a violation *121of an administrative building code provision prohibits the application of the open and obvious doctrine and precludes summary judgment on a negligence claim.” We accepted plaintiff-appellant Dorothy Lang’s discretionary appeal on the same issue.

{¶ 2} For the following reasons, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Vanderbilt v. Pier 27, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Davis v. WidmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Heimberger v. Zeal Hotel Group, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Colville v. Meijer Stores Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API