Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The sole issue presented for our determination is whether the trial court erred in holding as a matter of law that appellees did not breach the duty owed appellant as a business invitee.1
A shopkeeper owes business invitees a duty of ordinary care in maintaining the premises in a reasonably safe condition so that its customers are not unnecessarily and unreasonably exposed to danger. See Campbell v. Hughes Provision Co. (1950), 153 Ohio St. 9 [41 O.O.107]. A shopkeeper is not, however, an insurer of the customer’s safety. Further, a shopkeeper is under no duty to protect business invitees from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Boles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Campbell v. Hudges Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Rayburn v. J. C. Penney Outlet StoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by357 opinions
- Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- McGuire v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Carnes v. SiferdOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.